<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Generalising &#187; security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.generalist.org.uk/blog/tags/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.generalist.org.uk/blog</link>
	<description>because we can&#039;t think of anything wittier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Verified by Visa</title>
		<link>http://www.generalist.org.uk/blog/2010/verified-by-visa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.generalist.org.uk/blog/2010/verified-by-visa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.generalist.org.uk/blog/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Verified by Visa and MasterCard SecureCode: or, How Not to Design Authentication. [via] This is a very interesting paper; it confirms most of the basic misgivings I&#8217;ve had about the 3D Secure model of online card approval. (Basically: it&#8217;s not that it&#8217;s inherently not very secure, although it is, it&#8217;s that it encourages people to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/Papers/fc10vbvsecurecode.pdf"><i>Verified by Visa and MasterCard SecureCode: or, How Not to Design Authentication</i></a>. [<a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/02/online_creditde.html">via</a>]</p>
<p>This is a very interesting paper; it confirms most of the basic misgivings I&#8217;ve had about the 3D Secure model of online card approval. (Basically: it&#8217;s not that it&#8217;s inherently not very secure, although it is, it&#8217;s that it encourages people to be overly trusting of weird middleman attempts to get financial information. I mean&#8230; a frame pops up, which shows no obvious signs of whether or not it&#8217;s secure, coming from a domain which has no obvious connection to the card provider, registered in another country&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.generalist.org.uk/blog/2010/verified-by-visa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	<img style='margin:0;padding:0;border:0;' width='1px' height='1px' src="http://www.generalist.org.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/mystat/mystat.php?act=time_load&id=278021&rnd=564348803" /></channel>
</rss>

